Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 263
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Clin Anesth ; 90: 111181, 2023 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37454554

RESUMO

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To measure the incidence of intraoperative hypotension (IOH) during surgery in ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs) and describe associated characteristics of patients and procedures. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis. SETTING: 20 ASCs. PATIENTS: 16,750 patients having non-emergent, non-cardiac surgery; ASA physical status 2 through 4. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS: We assessed incidence of IOH using the definition from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS)-mean arterial pressure (MAP) < 65 mmHg for at least 15 cumulative minutes-and three secondary definitions: minutes of MAP <65 mmHg, area under MAP of 65 mmHg, and time-weighted average MAP <65 mmHg. MAIN RESULTS: 30.9% of ASC cases had a MAP <65 mmHg for at least 15 min. The incidence of IOH varied significantly, and was higher among younger adults (age 18-39; 36.2%), females (35.2%), and patients with ASA physical status 2 (32.8%). IOH increased with increasing surgery length, even when time-weighted, and was higher among low complexity (30.6%) than moderate complexity (28.8%) procedures, and highest among high complexity procedures (44.1%). CONCLUSIONS: There was substantial occurrence of IOH in ASCs, similar to that described in academic hospital settings in previous literature. We hypothesize that this may reflect clinician preference not to intervene in perceived healthy patients or assumptions about ability to tolerate lower blood pressures on behalf of these patients. Future research will determine whether IOH in ACSs is associated with adverse outcomes to the same extent as described in more complex hospital-based surgeries.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios , Hipotensão , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Idoso , Estados Unidos , Adolescente , Adulto Jovem , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estudos de Coortes , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios/efeitos adversos , Complicações Intraoperatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Intraoperatórias/etiologia , Medicare , Hipotensão/etiologia , Hipotensão/complicações
2.
BMC Anesthesiol ; 22(1): 15, 2022 01 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34996361

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The aim of this analysis is to determine geo-economic variations in epidemiology, ventilator settings and outcome in patients receiving general anesthesia for surgery. METHODS: Posthoc analysis of a worldwide study in 29 countries. Lower and upper middle-income countries (LMIC and UMIC), and high-income countries (HIC) were compared. The coprimary endpoint was the risk for and incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPC); secondary endpoints were intraoperative ventilator settings, intraoperative complications, hospital stay and mortality. RESULTS: Of 9864 patients, 4% originated from LMIC, 11% from UMIC and 85% from HIC. The ARISCAT score was 17.5 [15.0-26.0] in LMIC, 16.0 [3.0-27.0] in UMIC and 15.0 [3.0-26.0] in HIC (P = .003). The incidence of PPC was 9.0% in LMIC, 3.2% in UMIC and 2.5% in HIC (P < .001). Median tidal volume in ml kg- 1 predicted bodyweight (PBW) was 8.6 [7.7-9.7] in LMIC, 8.4 [7.6-9.5] in UMIC and 8.1 [7.2-9.1] in HIC (P < .001). Median positive end-expiratory pressure in cmH2O was 3.3 [2.0-5.0]) in LMIC, 4.0 [3.0-5.0] in UMIC and 5.0 [3.0-5.0] in HIC (P < .001). Median driving pressure in cmH2O was 14.0 [11.5-18.0] in LMIC, 13.5 [11.0-16.0] in UMIC and 12.0 [10.0-15.0] in HIC (P < .001). Median fraction of inspired oxygen in % was 75 [50-80] in LMIC, 50 [50-63] in UMIC and 53 [45-70] in HIC (P < .001). Intraoperative complications occurred in 25.9% in LMIC, in 18.7% in UMIC and in 37.1% in HIC (P < .001). Hospital mortality was 0.0% in LMIC, 1.3% in UMIC and 0.6% in HIC (P = .009). CONCLUSION: The risk for and incidence of PPC is higher in LMIC than in UMIC and HIC. Ventilation management could be improved in LMIC and UMIC. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov , identifier: NCT01601223.


Assuntos
Anestesia Geral/métodos , Complicações Intraoperatórias/epidemiologia , Pneumopatias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Pobreza/estatística & dados numéricos , Respiração Artificial/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Idoso , Países Desenvolvidos , Países em Desenvolvimento , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Internacionalidade , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Medição de Risco
3.
Eur Urol Focus ; 8(2): 563-571, 2022 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33858812

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: No data are available regarding the impact of time between a previous transrectal prostate biopsy (PB) and holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) on perioperative outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of time from PB to HoLEP on perioperative outcomes. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A total of 172 consecutive patients treated with HoLEP within 12 mo of a single previous transrectal PB at two tertiary centers were included. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Patients were stratified into two groups according to the median time from PB to HoLEP (namely, ≤6 and >6 mo). The primary outcome was intraoperative complications. Multivariate logistic regressions were used to identify the predictors of intraoperative complications. Linear regressions were used to test the association between the time from PB to HoLEP and intraoperative complications, enucleation efficiency, and enucleation time. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: In total, 93 (54%) and 79 (46%) patients had PB ≤ 6 and >6 mo before HoLEP, respectively. Patients in PB ≤ 6 mo group experienced higher rates of intraoperative complications than those in PB > 6 mo group (14% vs 2.6%, p = 0.04). At multivariable analysis, time between PB and HoLEP was an independent predictor of intraoperative complications (odds ratio: 0.74; 95% confidence interval: 0.6-0.9; p = 0.006). Finally, the risk of intraoperative complications reduced by 1.5%, efficiency of enucleation increased by 4.1%, and enucleation time reduced by 1.7 min for each month passed from PB to HoLEP (all p ≤ 0.006). Selection of patients with only one previous PB represents the main limitation. CONCLUSIONS: The time from PB to HoLEP of ≤6 mo is associated with a higher risk of intraoperative complications, lower enucleation efficacy, and longer enucleation time. PATIENT SUMMARY: Patients with a prostate biopsy (PB) ≤6 mo before holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) had significantly worse outcomes than those with a PB > 6 mo before HoLEP.


Assuntos
Lasers de Estado Sólido , Hiperplasia Prostática , Neoplasias da Próstata , Biópsia , Hólmio , Humanos , Complicações Intraoperatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Intraoperatórias/etiologia , Lasers de Estado Sólido/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Próstata/patologia , Próstata/cirurgia , Hiperplasia Prostática/complicações , Neoplasias da Próstata/complicações , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
4.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 80: 283-292, 2022 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34758376

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Patient injury claims data and insurance records provide detailed information on patient injuries. This study aimed to identify the errors and adverse events that led to patient injuries in vascular surgery for the treatments of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) and iliac artery aneurysms (IAA) in Finland. The study also assessed the severity and preventability of the injuries. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of Finnish Patient Insurance Centre's insurance charts of compensated patient injuries in the treatment of AAA and IAA. Records of all compensated patient injury claims involving AAA and IAA between 2004 and 2017 inclusive were reviewed. Contributing factors to injury were identified and classified. The injuries were assessed for their preventability by using the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist correctly. The degree of harm was graded by Clavien-Dindo classification. RESULTS: Twenty-six patient injury incidents were identified in the treatment of 23 patients. Typical injuries involved delays in diagnosis or treatment, errors in surgical technique or injuries to adjacent anatomic organs. Three (13.0%) patients died due to patient injury. Two deaths were caused by delays in diagnosis of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (RAAA) and the third death was due to missed diagnosis of post-operative myocardial infarction. Retained foreign material caused injuries to two (8.7%) patients. One (4.3%) patient had a severe postoperative infection. Three (13.0%) patients experienced an injury to an adjacent organ. One patient had a bilateral and another a unilateral above-the-knee amputation due to patient injury. Three injuries were considered preventable. Most harms were grade IIIb Clavien-Dindo classification in which injured patients required a surgical intervention under general anesthesia. CONCLUSIONS: Compensated patient injuries involving the treatment of AAA and IAA are rare, but are often serious. Injuries were identified during all stages of care. Most injuries involved open surgical procedures.


Assuntos
Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/cirurgia , Aneurisma Ilíaco/cirurgia , Complicações Intraoperatórias/epidemiologia , Erros Médicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/mortalidade , Ruptura Aórtica/diagnóstico , Ruptura Aórtica/mortalidade , Diagnóstico Tardio , Feminino , Finlândia/epidemiologia , Humanos , Aneurisma Ilíaco/mortalidade , Seguro Saúde , Complicações Intraoperatórias/economia , Masculino , Erros Médicos/economia , Erros Médicos/mortalidade , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/economia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/mortalidade , Sistema de Registros , Estudos Retrospectivos
5.
Obstet Gynecol ; 138(2): 208-217, 2021 08 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34237769

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To examine access to high-volume surgeons in comparison with low-volume surgeons who perform hysterectomies within high-volume hospitals and to compare perioperative morbidity and mortality between high-volume and low-volume surgeons within these centers. METHODS: Women who underwent hysterectomy in New York State between 2000 and 2014 at a high-volume (top quartile by volume) hospital were included. Surgeons were classified into quartiles based on average annual hysterectomy volume. Multivariable models were used to determine characteristics associated with treatment by a low-volume surgeon in comparison with a high-volume surgeon and to estimate the association between physician volume, and morbidity and mortality. RESULTS: A total of 300,586 patients cared for by 5,505 surgeons at 59 hospitals were identified. Women treated by low-volume surgeons, in comparison with high-volume surgeons, were more often Black (19.4% vs 14.3%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.26; 95% CI 1.09-1.46) and had Medicare insurance (20.6% vs 14.5%; aOR 1.22; 95% CI 1.04-1.42). Low-volume surgeons were more likely to perform both emergent-urgent procedures (26.1% vs 6.4%; aOR 3.91; 95% CI 3.26-4.69) and abdominal hysterectomy, compared with minimally invasive hysterectomy (77.8% vs 54.7%; aOR 1.91; 95% CI 1.62-2.24). Compared with patients cared for by high-volume surgeons, those operated on by low-volume surgeons had increased risk of a complication (31.0% vs 10.3%; adjusted risk ratios [aRR] 1.84; 95% CI 1.71-1.98) and mortality (2.2% vs 0.2%; aRR 3.04; 95% CI 2.20-4.21). In sensitivity analyses, differences in morbidity and mortality remained for emergent-urgent procedures, elective operations, cancer surgery, and noncancer procedures. CONCLUSION: Socioeconomic disparities remain in access to high-volume surgeons within high-volume hospitals for hysterectomy. Patients who undergo hysterectomy at a high-volume hospital by a low-volume surgeon are at substantially greater risk for perioperative morbidity and mortality.


Assuntos
Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais com Alto Volume de Atendimentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais/estatística & dados numéricos , Histerectomia/mortalidade , Histerectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Cirurgiões/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Idoso , População Negra , Feminino , Humanos , Histerectomia/métodos , Complicações Intraoperatórias/epidemiologia , Medicare , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/estatística & dados numéricos , New York/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Estados Unidos
6.
J Surg Res ; 266: 373-382, 2021 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34087621

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Inpatient cholecystectomy is associated with higher cost and morbidity relative to ambulatory cholecystectomy, yet the latter may be underutilized by minority and underinsured patients. The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of race, income, and insurance status on receipt of and outcomes following ambulatory cholecystectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective observational cohort study of patients 18-89 undergoing cholecystectomy for benign indications in Florida, Iowa, and New York, 2011-2014 using administrative databases. The primary outcome of interest was odds of having ambulatory cholecystectomy; secondary outcomes included intraoperative and postoperative complications, and 30-day unplanned admissions following ambulatory cholecystectomy. RESULTS: Among 321,335 cholecystectomies, 190,734 (59.4%) were ambulatory and 130,601 (40.6%) were inpatient. Adjusting for age, sex, insurance, income, residential location, and comorbidities, the odds of undergoing ambulatory versus inpatient cholecystectomy were significantly lower in black (aOR = 0.71, 95% CI [0.69, 0.73], P< 0.001) and Hispanic (aOR = 0.71, 95% CI [0.69, 0.72], P< 0.001) patients compared to white patients, and significantly lower in Medicare (aOR = 0.77, 95% CI [0.75, 0.80] P < 0.001), Medicaid (aOR = 0.56, 95% CI [0.54, 0.57], P< 0.001) and uninsured/self-pay (aOR = 0.28, 95% CI [0.27, 0.28], P< 0.001) patients relative to privately insured patients. Patients with Medicaid and those classified as self-pay/uninsured had higher odds of postoperative complications and unplanned admission as did patients with Medicare compared to privately insured individuals. CONCLUSIONS: Racial and ethnic minorities and the underinsured have a higher likelihood of receiving inpatient as compared to ambulatory cholecystectomy. The higher incidence of postoperative complications in these patients may be associated with unequal access to ambulatory surgery.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios/estatística & dados numéricos , Colecistectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/etnologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Cobertura do Seguro , Complicações Intraoperatórias/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Classe Social , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
7.
J Orthop Surg Res ; 16(1): 308, 2021 May 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33980261

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Robot-assisted platforms in spine surgery have rapidly developed into an attractive technology for both the surgeon and patient. Although current literature is promising, more clinical data is needed. The purpose of this paper is to determine the effect of robot-related complications on clinical outcomes METHODS: This multicenter study included adult (≥18 years old) patients who underwent robot-assisted lumbar fusion surgery from 2012-2019. The minimum follow-up was 1 year after surgery. Both bivariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine if robot-related factors were associated with reoperation within 1 year after primary surgery. RESULTS: A total of 320 patients were included in this study. The mean (standard deviation) Charlson Comorbidity Index was 1.2 (1.2) and 52.5% of patients were female. Intraoperative robot complications occurred in 3.4% of patients and included intraoperative exchange of screw (0.9%), robot abandonment (2.5%), and return to the operating room for screw exchange (1.3%). The 1-year reoperation rate was 4.4%. Robot factors, including robot time per screw, open vs. percutaneous, and robot system, were not statistically different between those who required revision surgery and those who did not (P>0.05). Patients with robot complications were more likely to have prolonged length of hospital stay and blood transfusion, but were not at higher risk for 1-year reoperations. The most common reasons for reoperation were wound complications (2.2%) and persistent symptoms due to inadequate decompression (1.5%). In the multivariate analysis, robot related factors and complications were not independent risk factors for 1-year reoperations. CONCLUSION: This is the largest multicenter study to focus on robot-assisted lumbar fusion outcomes. Our findings demonstrate that 1-year reoperation rates are low and do not appear to be influenced by robot-related factors and complications; however, robot-related complications may increase the risk for greater blood loss requiring a blood transfusion and longer length of stay.


Assuntos
Artrodese/efeitos adversos , Vértebras Lombares/cirurgia , Reoperação , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/efeitos adversos , Fusão Vertebral/efeitos adversos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Artrodese/métodos , Transfusão de Sangue/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Complicações Intraoperatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Intraoperatórias/etiologia , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Risco , Fatores de Risco , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodos , Fusão Vertebral/métodos , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
8.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand ; 100(9): 1730-1739, 2021 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33895985

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The study aims to analyze differences between robot-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy (RATLH) and total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) in benign indications, emphasizing surgeon and hospital volume. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All women in Sweden undergoing a total hysterectomy for benign indications with or without a bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2017 (n = 12 386) were identified from three national Swedish registers. Operative time, blood loss, conversion rate, complications, readmission, reoperation, length of hospital stays, and time to daily life activity were evaluated by univariable and multivariable regression models in RATLH and TLH. Surgeon and hospital volume were obtained from the Swedish National Quality Register of Gynecological Surgery and divided into subclasses. RESULTS: TLH was associated with a higher rate of intraoperative complications (adjusted odds ratios [aOR] 2.8, 95% CI 1.3-5.8) and postoperative bleeding complications (aOR 1.8, 95% CI 1.2-2.9) compared with RATLH. Intraoperative data showed a higher conversion rate (aOR 13.5, 95% CI 7.2-25.4), a higher blood loss (200-500 mL aOR 3.5, 95% CI 2.7-4.7; > 500 mL aOR 7.6, 95% CI 4.0-14.6) and a longer operative time (1-2 h aOR 16.7 95% CI 10.2-27.5; >2 h aOR 47.6, 95% CI 27.9-81.1) in TLH compared with RATLH. The TLH group had a lower caseload per year than the RATLH group. Higher surgical volume was associated with lower median blood loss, shorter operative time, a lower conversion rate, and a lower perioperative complication rate. Differences in conversion rate or operative time in RATLH were not affected by surgeon volume when compared with TLH. One year after surgery, patient satisfaction was higher in RATLH than in TLH (aOR 0.6, 95% CI 0.4-0.9). CONCLUSIONS: RATLH led to better perioperative outcome and higher patient satisfaction 1 year after surgery. These outcome differences were slightly more pronounced in very low-volume surgeons but persisted across all surgeon volume groups.


Assuntos
Histerectomia , Laparoscopia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Ocupação de Leitos , Feminino , Humanos , Complicações Intraoperatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Intraoperatórias/etiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Sistema de Registros , Cirurgiões , Suécia/epidemiologia
9.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 100(12): e25274, 2021 Mar 26.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33761730

RESUMO

ABSTRACT: To investigate the influencing factors of fracture nonunion after intramedullary nailing for subtrochanteric fractures and to construct a risk assessment model.Based on the multicenter retrospective analysis of 251 patients, all patients were divided into modeling group and verification group. In the modeling group, postoperative fracture nonunion rate, general data, fracture-related factors, surgical reduction-related factors, mechanical and biological factors were calculated, and the influencing factors of fracture nonunion were screened by univariate analysis. Logistic regression model was used for multifactor analysis to construct the risk assessment model. Based on the logistic regression model, the risk prediction model was constructed by drawing the Nomogram diagram. Through the verification group, the influencing factors were evaluated again, and the differentiation and calibration of the model were evaluated. The calibration degree was evaluated by Hosmer-Lemeshow test, goodness of fit test, and calibration curve. The discriminant degree was evaluated by the receiver operating characteristic curve.Fracture nonunion occurred in 34 of 149 patients in the modeling group. Among the 14 potential influencing factors, univariate analysis and logistic regression analysis showed that postoperative hip varus, intramedullary nail fixation failure, and reduction of fracture with large incision were the risk factors of fracture nonunion. The medial cortex fracture was seen reduced on X-Ray was a protective factor for fracture nonunion, and a regression equation was established. Based on the logistic regression model, the Nomogram diagram is drawn. Twenty-four cases of fracture nonunion occurred in the verification group. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was area under curve =0.883 > 0.7, indicating that there was a moderate differentiation to evaluate the occurrence of fracture nonunion after operation. The goodness of fit test: the Hosmers-Lemeshow test (X2 = 2.921, P = .712 > .05) showed that the model had a good calibration.After intramedullary nailing of subtrochanteric fracture, hip varus, failure of intramedullary nail fixation and wide surgical dissection are the risk factors of fracture nonunion, and the postoperative reduction of medial cortex fracture is protective factor.National key research and development projects: 2016YFC0105806.


Assuntos
Coxa Vara , Fixação Intramedular de Fraturas , Fraturas não Consolidadas , Fraturas do Quadril/cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Medição de Risco , Idoso , Pinos Ortopédicos , Coxa Vara/diagnóstico , Coxa Vara/epidemiologia , Feminino , Fixação Intramedular de Fraturas/efeitos adversos , Fixação Intramedular de Fraturas/instrumentação , Fixação Intramedular de Fraturas/métodos , Fraturas não Consolidadas/diagnóstico , Fraturas não Consolidadas/epidemiologia , Fraturas não Consolidadas/etiologia , Fraturas do Quadril/diagnóstico , Humanos , Complicações Intraoperatórias/diagnóstico , Complicações Intraoperatórias/epidemiologia , Masculino , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/diagnóstico , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Radiografia/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco/métodos , Medição de Risco/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores de Risco , Falha de Tratamento
10.
Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol ; 35(1): 93-103, 2021 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33742581

RESUMO

Incident Reporting Systems (IRS) continue to be an important influence on improving patient safety. IRS can provide valuable insights into how to prevent patients from being harmed at the organizational level. But inadequate expectations and misuse, for performance assessment, patient safety measurement or research, have hindered the full IRS potential. Health care organizations need to develop effective strategies built on trust and truth telling to improve the impact of IRS. This requires strategies to address the limited resources to analyse the near-misses or adverse events; avoid the punitive drift through maintaining the anonymity and protective legislation; integrating IRS and avoiding its confusion with mandatory adverse event response systems; training data analysts to focus on the system instead of the individual through a balanced simple taxonomy; combine the analyses at the local level, to reinforce effective and personalized feedback, with the potential of a national or supranational learning platform.


Assuntos
Anestesia/normas , Complicações Intraoperatórias/epidemiologia , Segurança do Paciente/normas , Assistência Perioperatória/normas , Gestão de Riscos/normas , Anestesia/efeitos adversos , Anestesia/métodos , Humanos , Complicações Intraoperatórias/diagnóstico , Complicações Intraoperatórias/prevenção & controle , Assistência Perioperatória/métodos , Gestão de Riscos/métodos
11.
Am J Cardiol ; 143: 37-45, 2021 03 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33387472

RESUMO

Ellis grade III coronary artery perforations (G3-CAP) remain a life-threatening complication of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), with high morbidity and mortality and lack of consensus regarding optimal treatment strategies. We reviewed all PCIs performed in 10 European centers from 1993 to 2019 recording all G3-CAP along with management strategies, in-hospital and long-term outcome according to Device-related perforations (DP) and Guidewire-related perforations (WP). Among 106,592 PCI (including 7,773 chronic total occlusions), G3-CAP occurred in 311 patients (0.29%). DP occurred in 194 cases (62.4%), more commonly in proximal segments (73.2%) and frequently secondary to balloon dilatation (66.0%). WP arose in 117 patients (37.6%) with chronic total occlusions guidewires involved in 61.3% of cases. Overall sealing success rate was 90.7% and usually required multiple maneuvers (80.4%). The most commonly adopted strategies to obtain hemostasis were prolonged balloon inflation (73.2%) with covered stent implantation (64.4%) in the DP group, and prolonged balloon inflation (53.8%) with coil embolization (41%) in the WP group.  Procedural or in-hospital events arose in 38.2% of cases: mortality was higher after DP (7.2% vs 2.6%, p = 0.05) and acute stent thrombosis 3-fold higher (3.1% vs 0.9%, p = 0.19). At clinical follow-up, median 2 years, a major cardiovascular event occurred in one-third of cases (all-cause mortality 8.2% and 7.1% respectively, without differences between groups). In conclusion, although rare and despite improved rates of adequate perforation sealing G3-CAP cause significant adverse events. DP and WP result in different patterns of G3-CAP and management strategies should be based on this classification.


Assuntos
Doença da Artéria Coronariana/cirurgia , Oclusão Coronária/cirurgia , Vasos Coronários/lesões , Complicações Intraoperatórias/epidemiologia , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/efeitos adversos , Lesões do Sistema Vascular/epidemiologia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Angioplastia Coronária com Balão/efeitos adversos , Stents Farmacológicos , Embolização Terapêutica/métodos , Feminino , Hemostasia Cirúrgica/métodos , Humanos , Incidência , Complicações Intraoperatórias/etiologia , Complicações Intraoperatórias/terapia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/instrumentação , Sistema de Registros , Lesões do Sistema Vascular/etiologia , Lesões do Sistema Vascular/terapia
12.
Acta Orthop ; 92(3): 311-315, 2021 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33459568

RESUMO

Background and purpose - Orthopedic surgery is one of the specialties with most compensation claims, therefore we assessed the most common reasons for complaints following total hip arthroplasty (THA) reported to the Norwegian System of Patient Injury Compensation (NPE) and viewed these complaints in light of the data from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register (NAR).Patients and methods - We collected data from NPE and NAR for the study period (2008-2018), including age, sex, and type of complaint, and reason for accepted claims from NPE, and the number of arthroplasty surgeries from NAR. The institutions were grouped by quartiles into quarters according to annual procedure volume, and the effect of hospital procedure volume on the risk for accepted claim was estimated.Results - 70,327 THAs were reported to NAR. NPE handled 1,350 claims, corresponding to 1.9% of all reported THAs. 595 (44%) claims were accepted, representing 0.8% of all THAs. Hospital-acquired infection was the most common reason for accepted claims (34%), followed by wrong implant position in 11% of patients. Low annual volume institutions (less than 93 THAs per year) had a statistically significant 1.6 times higher proportion of accepted claims compared with higher volume institutions.Interpretation - The 0.8% risk of accepted claims following THAs is 1.6 times higher for patients treated in low-volume institutions, which should consider increasing the volume of THAs or referring these patients to higher volume institutions.


Assuntos
Artroplastia de Quadril/efeitos adversos , Artroplastia de Quadril/estatística & dados numéricos , Compensação e Reparação , Complicações Intraoperatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Sistema de Registros , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Criança , Feminino , Prótese de Quadril , Humanos , Doença Iatrogênica/epidemiologia , Revisão da Utilização de Seguros , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Noruega , Adulto Jovem
13.
Am J Ophthalmol ; 221: 27-38, 2021 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32828874

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To evaluate cataract surgery complexity and complications among US Medicare beneficiaries with and without dementia. DESIGN: Retrospective claims-based cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: A 20% representative sample of Medicare beneficiaries, 2006-2015. METHODS: Dementia was identified from diagnosis codes on or prior to each beneficiary's first-eye cataract surgery. For each surgery, we identified setting, routine vs complex coding, anesthesia provider type, duration, and any postoperative hospitalization. We evaluated 30- and 90-day complication rates-return to operating room, endophthalmitis, suprachoroidal hemorrhage, retinal detachment, retinal tear, macular edema, glaucoma, or choroidal detachment-and used adjusted regression models to evaluate likelihood of surgical characteristics and complications. Complication analyses were stratified by second-eye cataract surgery within 90 days postoperatively. RESULTS: We identified 457,128 beneficiaries undergoing first-eye cataract surgery, 23,332 (5.1%) with dementia. None of the evaluated surgical complications were more likely in dementia-diagnosed beneficiaries. There was also no difference in likelihood of nonambulatory surgery center setting, anesthesiologist provider, or postoperative hospitalization. Dementia-diagnosed beneficiaries were more likely to have surgeries coded as complex (15.6% of cases vs 8.8%, P < .0001), and surgeries exceeding 30 minutes (OR = 1.21, 95% CI = 1.17-1.25). CONCLUSIONS: Among US Medicare beneficiaries undergoing cataract surgery, those with dementia are more likely to have "complex" surgery" lasting more than 30 minutes. However, they do not have greater likelihood of surgical complications, higher-acuity setting, advanced anesthesia care, or postoperative hospitalization. This may be influenced by case selection and may suggest missed opportunities to improve vision. Future research is needed to identify dementia patients likely to benefit from cataract surgery.


Assuntos
Extração de Catarata/estatística & dados numéricos , Catarata/complicações , Demência/complicações , Medicare/estatística & dados numéricos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Hemorragia da Coroide/epidemiologia , Demência/diagnóstico , Endoftalmite/epidemiologia , Feminino , Glaucoma/epidemiologia , Humanos , Complicações Intraoperatórias/epidemiologia , Edema Macular/epidemiologia , Masculino , Descolamento Retiniano/epidemiologia , Perfurações Retinianas/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos
14.
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A ; 31(1): 124-129, 2021 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32990497

RESUMO

Background: Single-port, laparoscopic, needle-assisted, inguinal hernia repair (LNAR) in children intends to reduce surgical trauma and enables contralateral assessment and closure of contralateral patent processus vaginalis if necessary. The aim of the present study was to demonstrate that laparoscopic inguinal repair can be performed safely and cost-effectively in a developing country where laparoscopy is not yet commonly used. Methods: In this single-center study, we included all children undergoing LNAR between January 2017 and December 2018. Intraoperative and postoperative complications and hospital costs were assessed. Results: We performed 148 hernia repair operations in 117 children (age range 1 month to 15 years). Mean operative time was 20.8 ± 9.4 minutes. Mean length of hospital stay amounted to 10 ± 7.6 hours, with 77.7% of patients discharged within 6 hours. No intraoperative complications occurred in any patient. Complications occurred in six (5.1%) patients. Three (2.5%) patients experienced residual hydrocele, two (1.4%) patients suffered wound site seroma, and one (0.67%) patient experienced recurrent inguinal hernia 6 months after the initial repair. All complications occurred during the first year of the study period. Likewise, operative time (P < .0001) as well as duration of hospital stay (P < .0001) was significantly shorter in the second year. Total costs for complete treatment were below USD 80 per patient, which is comparable with the costs associated with open herniotomy at the same institution. Conclusion: Single-port LNAR and hydrocele repair in children were established safely and cost-effectively in a developing country. Nevertheless, the procedure was associated with a steep learning curve.


Assuntos
Países em Desenvolvimento , Hérnia Inguinal/cirurgia , Herniorrafia/métodos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Análise Custo-Benefício , Feminino , Hérnia Inguinal/economia , Herniorrafia/economia , Custos Hospitalares/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Complicações Intraoperatórias/economia , Complicações Intraoperatórias/epidemiologia , Laparoscopia/economia , Curva de Aprendizado , Tempo de Internação/economia , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Nepal , Duração da Cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/economia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos Retrospectivos
15.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 224(6): 589.e1-589.e13, 2021 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33359176

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Safety warnings about power morcellation in 2014 considerably changed hysterectomy practice, especially for laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy that typically requires morcellation to remove the corpus uteri while preserving the cervix. Hospitals might vary in how they respond to safety warnings and altered hysterectomy procedures to avoid use of power morcellation. However, there has been little data on how hospitals differ in their practice changes. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine whether hospitals varied in their use of laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy after safety warnings about power morcellation and compare the risk of surgical complications at hospitals that had different response trajectories in use of laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective analysis of data from the New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System and the State Inpatient Databases and State Ambulatory Surgery and Services Databases from 14 other states. We identified women aged ≥18 years undergoing hysterectomy for benign indications in the hospital inpatient and outpatient settings from October 1, 2013 to September 30, 2015. We calculated a risk-adjusted utilization rate of laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy for each hospital in each calendar quarter after accounting for patient clinical risk factors. Applying a growth mixture modeling approach, we identified distinct groups of hospitals that exhibited different trajectories of using laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy over time. Within each trajectory group, we compared patients' risk of surgical complications in the prewarning (2013Q4-2014Q1), transition (2014Q2-2014Q4), and postwarning (2015Q1-2015Q3) period using multivariable regressions. RESULTS: Among 212,146 women undergoing benign hysterectomy at 511 hospitals, the use of laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy decreased from 15.1% in 2013Q4 to 6.2% in 2015Q3. The use of laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy at these 511 hospitals exhibited 4 distinct trajectory patterns: persistent low use (mean risk-adjusted utilization rate of laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy changed from 2.8% in 2013Q4 to 0.6% in 2015Q3), decreased medium use (17.0% to 6.9%), decreased high use (51.4% to 24.2%), and rapid abandonment (30.5% to 0.8%). In the meantime, use of open abdominal hysterectomy increased by 2.1, 4.1, 7.8, and 11.8 percentage points between the prewarning and postwarning periods in these 4 trajectory groups, respectively. Compared with the prewarning period, the risk of major complications in the postwarning period decreased among patients at "persistent low use" hospitals (adjusted odds ratio, 0.88; 95% confidence interval, 0.81-0.94). In contrast, the risk of major complications increased among patients at "rapid abandonment" hospitals (adjusted odds ratio, 1.48; 95% confidence interval, 1.11-1.98), and the risk of minor complications increased among patients at "decreased high use" hospitals (adjusted odds ratio, 1.31; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.72). CONCLUSION: Hospitals varied in their use of laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy after safety warnings about power morcellation. Complication risk increased at hospitals that shifted considerably toward open abdominal hysterectomy.


Assuntos
Fidelidade a Diretrizes/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais/estatística & dados numéricos , Histerectomia/métodos , Laparoscopia/estatística & dados numéricos , Morcelação/estatística & dados numéricos , Segurança do Paciente/normas , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais/normas , Humanos , Histerectomia/efeitos adversos , Histerectomia/normas , Histerectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Complicações Intraoperatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Intraoperatórias/etiologia , Complicações Intraoperatórias/prevenção & controle , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Laparoscopia/normas , Modelos Logísticos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Morcelação/efeitos adversos , Morcelação/métodos , Morcelação/normas , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Segurança do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Padrões de Prática Médica/normas , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Estados Unidos , Adulto Jovem
16.
Rev Colomb Obstet Ginecol ; 71(3): 257-264, 2020 09.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33247889

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To describe intra and postoperative complications of total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) for benign uterine pathology and to compare with other hospitals with large volumes of laparoscopic hysterectomies. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of women who underwent TLH for benign gynecological pathology between 2007 and 2017 in a private high complexity institution that serves populations covered by contributive and state-subsidized insurance in Pereira, Colombia. The procedures were performed by the group of surgeons of the ALGIA training center. Consecutive sampling was used. Sociodemographic and baseline clinical characteristics, intra-operative findings and intra- and post-operative complications are described. Descriptive statistics were used. RESULTS: A total of 1.350 patients were included during the study period. Surgical time was 95 minutes (SD ± 31), blood loss 88 cc (SD ± 66), and average uterine weight was 236 g (SD ± 133); 96.5% of the patients were assessed within the next 30 to 45 days; 3.48% had minor complications and 2.5% had major complications; 3 patients were converted to laparotomy. There were no deaths in the study sample. CONCLUSIONS: TLH is a safe procedure and the rate of complications is similar to the best international standards. Further prospective studies using objective criteria are important in order to compare the performance of different groups and institutions offering surgical procedures and training.


TITULO: SEGURIDAD DE LA HISTERECTOMÍA TOTAL POR LAPAROSCOPIA ENTRE EL 2007 Y 2017 EN UN HOSPITAL DE ALTA COMPLEJIDAD, PEREIRA, COLOMBIA. ESTUDIO DE COHORTE. OBJETIVO: Describir las complicaciones intra y posoperatorias de la histerectomía total por laparoscopia (HTL) para patología benigna del útero y hacer una comparación con otros hospitales que tienen altos volúmenes de HTL. METODOS: Estudio de cohorte retrospectivo en mujeres que se sometieron a HTL por patología ginecológica benigna entre 2007 y 2017 en una institución privada de alta complejidad, que atiende población perteneciente al régimen contributivo y subsidiado por el Estado en el Sistema General de Seguridad Social, en Pereira, Colombia, por el grupo de cirujanos del centro de entrenamiento ALGIA. Muestreo consecutivo. Se describen la características sociodemográficas y clínicas basales, los hallazgos intraoperatorios y las complicaciones intra y posoperatorias. Se usó estadística descriptiva. RESULTADOS: en el periodo de estudio se incluyeron 1.350 pacientes. El tiempo quirúrgico fue de 95 min (DE ± 31), el sangrado quirúrgico 88 cc (DE ± 66), el peso promedio del útero fue de 236 g (DE ± 133). El 96,5 % de las pacientes fueron evaluadas entre los 30 y 45 días. El 3,48 % de las pacientes tuvieron complicaciones menores y el 2,5 % complicaciones mayores. Tres pacientes requirieron conversión a laparotomía (0,23%). No hubo mortalidad en la muestra estudiada. CONCLUSIONES: la HTL es un procedimiento seguro y la tasa de complicaciones es similar a la de los mejores estándares internacionales. Es importante que se sigan haciendo estudios prospectivos con criterios objetivos de evaluación para comparar el desempeño de los diferentes grupos e instituciones que ofrecen procedimientos quirúrgicos y entrenamiento.


Assuntos
Histerectomia/métodos , Complicações Intraoperatórias/epidemiologia , Laparoscopia/métodos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Perda Sanguínea Cirúrgica , Estudos de Coortes , Colômbia , Feminino , Humanos , Histerectomia/efeitos adversos , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Laparotomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Duração da Cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Doenças Uterinas/cirurgia , Adulto Jovem
17.
J Neurosurg Anesthesiol ; 32(4): 315-322, 2020 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32898387

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Timing of neurosurgical procedures is controversial. Challenges identified with night-time surgeries include physician fatigue and sleep deprivation, and fewer staff and resources compared with daytime surgery. These might contribute to medical errors and complications, and, hence, worse patient outcomes. METHODS: This single center retrospective study of 304 patients who underwent emergent neurosurgical procedures between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2016 included 2 groups based on the timing of surgery: daytime (7:00 AM to 6:59 PM) and night-time (7:00 PM to 6:59 AM) surgery groups. Patient demographics, diagnosis, surgical characteristics, complications, and neurological outcome were obtained from the medical records. RESULTS: There was no difference in patient demographics, intraoperative complications, and length of surgery between the 2 groups. Although there was no statistically significant difference in neurological outcome between the 2 groups at hospital discharge and 1 month postdischarge, there was a higher proportion of patients in the night-time surgical group with unfavorable neurological outcome (Glasgow Outcome Score 1 to 3) at both these times. There were differences in hospital length of stay, location of postoperative management (postanesthesia care unit or intensive care unit), midline shift, baseline Glasgow Coma Scale score, and acuity of surgery between the 2 groups. Logistic regression analysis showed that age, baseline Glasgow Coma Scale score, surgery acuity status, procedure type, and intraoperative complications influenced neurological outcome. CONCLUSIONS: This study found no difference in the rate of unfavorable neurological outcome in patients undergoing emergent neurosurgical procedures during the daytime and night-time. However, our findings cannot exclude the possibility of an association between timing of surgery and outcome given its limitations, including small sample size and omission of potentially confounding variables. Further well-designed prospective trials are warranted to confirm our findings.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Neurocirúrgicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Agendamento de Consultas , Feminino , Escala de Coma de Glasgow , Humanos , Complicações Intraoperatórias/epidemiologia , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Duração da Cirurgia , Alta do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Cuidados Pós-Operatórios , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Resultado do Tratamento
18.
World Neurosurg ; 144: e353-e360, 2020 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32841797

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (ECI) and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) are commonly used measures that use administrative data to characterize a patient's comorbidity burden. The purpose of this study was to compare the ability of these measures to predict outcomes following anterior lumbar interbody fusion. METHODS: The National Inpatient Sample was queried for all ALIF procedures between 2013 and 2014. The area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) was used to compare the ECI and CCI in their ability to predict postoperative complications when incorporated into a base model containing age, sex, race, and primary payer. Percent superiority was computed using AUC values for ECI, CCI, and base models. RESULTS: A total of 43,930 hospitalizations were included in this study. The ECI was superior to the CCI and baseline models in predicting minor (AUC 71 vs. 0.66, P < 0.0001) and major (AUC 0.74 vs. 0.67, P < 0.0001) complications. When evaluating individual complications, the ECI was superior to the CCI in predicting airway complications (65% superior, AUC 0.85 vs. 0.72, P = 0.0001); hemorrhagic anemia (83% superior, AUC 0.71 vs. 0.66, P < 0.0001); myocardial infarction (76% superior, AUC 0.86 vs. 0.67, P < 0.0001); cardiac arrest (75% superior, AUC 0.85 vs. 0.67, P < 0.0001); pulmonary embolism (105% superior, AUC 0.91 vs. 0.71, P < 0.0001); and urinary tract infection (43% superior, AUC 0.76 vs. 0.73, P = 0.046). CONCLUSIONS: The ECI was superior to the CCI in predicting 6 of the 15 complications analyzed in this study. Combined with previous results, the ECI may be a better predictive model in spine surgery.


Assuntos
Comorbidade , Vértebras Lombares/cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Fusão Vertebral/efeitos adversos , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Área Sob a Curva , Etnicidade , Feminino , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Seguro Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Complicações Intraoperatórias/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Medição de Risco , Fatores Sexuais
19.
Eur Urol Oncol ; 3(6): 780-783, 2020 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32474006

RESUMO

The definition of intraoperative adverse events (IAEs) still lacks standardization, hampering the assessment of surgical performance in this regard. Over the years, efforts to address this issue have been carried out to improve the reporting of outcomes. In 2019, the European Association of Urology (EAU) proposed a standardized reporting tool for IAEs in urology. The objective of the present study is to distill systematically published data on IAEs in patients undergoing robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) for renal masses to answer three key questions (KQs). (KQ1) Which system is used to report the IAEs? (KQ2) What is the frequency of IAEs? (KQ3) What types of IAEs are reported? A comprehensive systematic review of all English-language publications on RPN was carried out. We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to evaluate PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases (from January 1, 2000 to January 1, 2019). Quality of reporting and grading complications were assessed according to the EAU recommendations. Globally, 59 (35.3%) and 108 (64.7%) studies reported zero and one or more IAEs, respectively. Overall, 761 (2.6%) patients reported at least one IAE. Intraoperative bleeding is reported as the most common IAE (58%). Our analysis showed no improvement in reporting and grading of IAEs over time. PATIENT SUMMARY: Up to now, an agreement regarding the definition and reporting of intraoperative adverse events (IAEs) in the literature has not been achieved. The aim of this study is to evaluate the reporting of IAEs in patients undergoing robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) after a systematic review of the literature. More rigorous reporting of IAEs during RPN is needed to measure their impact on patients' perioperative care.


Assuntos
Complicações Intraoperatórias/epidemiologia , Nefrectomia/efeitos adversos , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde/normas , Gestão de Riscos/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Complicações Intraoperatórias/diagnóstico , Complicações Intraoperatórias/prevenção & controle , Nefrectomia/métodos , Assistência Perioperatória/normas , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Gestão de Riscos/organização & administração , Gestão de Riscos/normas , Índice de Gravidade de Doença
20.
Eur J Surg Oncol ; 46(5): 839-846, 2020 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32151530

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The indication for choosing the minimally invasive approach for large adrenal mass remains controversial. This study is to assess perioperative outcomes after minimally invasive adrenalectomy (MIA) versus open adrenalectomy (OA) for adrenal mass ≥ 6 cm. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cohort of 173 patients underwent adrenalectomy for adrenal mass ≥ 6 cm in our urology center between May 2005 and April 2018 was included. MIA was performed in 96 patients, whereas 77 patients underwent OA. We performed a retrospective propensity score-matched study to compare MIA versus OA. RESULTS: After propensity score-matched, 58 matched pairs of patients identified from each group. There were no significant differences between the groups in postoperative morbidity (p = 0.146), operative time (p = 0.163), intraoperative hypertension (p = 0.248) and drainage time (p = 0.188). Estimated blood loss, the rate of blood transfusions postoperative hospital stay was less in MIA group (p < 0.0001; p = 0.007; p < 0.0001). Total expense was significantly more in the MIA group [49379.28 (38496.69, 68008.69) CNY vs 39951.48 (30666.33, 50292.03) CNY, p = 0.001]. CONCLUSIONS: MIA results in equivalent perioperative outcomes compared with OA and is an effective and safe surgical method for patients with an adrenal mass more than 6 cm in diameter.


Assuntos
Neoplasias das Glândulas Suprarrenais/cirurgia , Adrenalectomia/métodos , Hipertensão/epidemiologia , Hipotensão/epidemiologia , Complicações Intraoperatórias/epidemiologia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/métodos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Neoplasias do Córtex Suprarrenal/patologia , Neoplasias do Córtex Suprarrenal/cirurgia , Neoplasias das Glândulas Suprarrenais/patologia , Adenoma Adrenocortical/patologia , Adenoma Adrenocortical/cirurgia , Adulto , Perda Sanguínea Cirúrgica , Transfusão de Sangue/estatística & dados numéricos , China , Drenagem , Endoscopia , Feminino , Custos Hospitalares , Humanos , Laparoscopia , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mielolipoma/patologia , Mielolipoma/cirurgia , Duração da Cirurgia , Feocromocitoma/patologia , Feocromocitoma/cirurgia , Pontuação de Propensão , Espaço Retroperitoneal , Estudos Retrospectivos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Carga Tumoral
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA